Hunter Biden Admits His Laptop Was Real, Not Russian Disinformation

While most anyone paying attention from the very beginning of the Hunter Biden laptop saga back in the Fall of 2020 could pretty quickly discern the story was legitimate, it’s taken years for some media outlets to show any interest in the potential criminal behavior of the President’s son.

Originally dismissed as a “Russian disinformation” campaign by a disgraced group of 51 former intelligence analysts, the laptop dropped off by President Biden’s son at a Delaware computer shop was not only authentic but also filled with damning information about the Biden crime family.

When Hunter Biden failed to pick up the laptop, it became the property of the computer store owner who then took a look at its contents. He was appalled to the point of contacting the FBI due to the mountain of evidence the laptop contained of what appeared to be criminal wrongdoing.

Well, now Hunter Biden’s attorneys have issued a letter, directed at the repair shop owner, that not only asserts the laptop is 100% genuine and was the property of their client, but now calls for investigations into what they claim was illegal access to the information contained on the laptop.

Once again, the New York Post, which has now had too many victory laps to count, covered the story:

So much for, the laptop “could be” mine.

First son Hunter Biden’s lawyers admitted late Wednesday that the infamous laptop the now-52-year-old abandoned at a Delaware computer repair shop in the throes of his crack cocaine addiction does indeed belong to him.

The revelation came in a petulant letter from Hunter’s lawyers seeking a criminal probe into what they called, attempts to “weaponize” its contents.

In the 14-page letter to Delaware Attorney General Kathy Jennings, Biden’s attorney Abbe Lowell claimed that repair shop owner John Paul Mac Isaac “unlawfully” accessed Hunter’s laptop data and worked with former President Donald Trump’s personal lawyer Rudy Giuliani to “weaponize” sordid and incriminating contents on it against Joe Biden.

“This failed dirty political trick directly resulted in the exposure, exploitation, and manipulation of Mr. Biden’s private and personal information,” Lowell wrote.

“Mr. Mac Isaac’s intentional, reckless, and unlawful conduct allowed for hundreds of gigabytes of Mr. Biden’s personal data, without any discretion, to be circulated around the Internet.”

Mac Isaac took possession of the laptop and hard drive late in 2019 after trying and failing for months to notify Hunter that the device was ready to be picked up. Once the shop owner saw the laptop’s contents — including emails detailing influence-peddling involving then-Vice President Joe Biden and videos of the younger Biden smoking crack and having sex with prostitutes and his work subordinates — he alerted the FBI.

So, not only was the laptop real and not Russian disinformation but now it’s laid bare that it was indeed the property of Hunter Biden.

An attorney for the repair shop owner scoffed at the letter as nothing more than an intimidation tactic. After all, Hunter Biden had signed a contract that explicitly stated that the repair shop owner could access the contents for the repair and also spelled out the terms upon which the property would be forfeited if it was not picked up after a certain time period.

This story seems like beating a dead horse at this point but it’s critical to avoid letting it slip under the rug. When the New York Post first broke the news before the 2020 election, after a thorough and diligent investigation into the authenticity of the laptop contents, social media companies, at the behest of the government and the Biden campaign, banned the Post’s account and limited sharing of the story for purely political reasons.

The only election interference in recent years has not been from Russia but from forces within the Democratic Party attempting to kill information it doesn’t like. If Joe Biden was forced to answer for the contents of the laptop, such as his 10% cut as “the big guy” from foreign business deals, the 2020 election might’ve ended differently. Instead, Joe Biden was given cover by a group of former intelligence agents and analysts who, without even seeing the laptop or the contents, signed a letter stating it was Russian disinformation. This gave left-leaning media outlets cover to discount the story and even Joe Biden cover to claim it was a nothing burger.

It’s critical that House Republicans follow through with their investigations and release as much information as they can concerning how the Biden family has sold its influence to the highest foreign bidder over the past two decades.

It goes without saying but if Hunter’s last name was Trump instead of Biden, this story would’ve been wall-to-wall on every major media outlet and he’d probably be in handcuffs already.