Watch: Can Nevada Avoid Another Caucus Meltdown?

CBS News reporter Tanya Rivero speaks with Steve Sebelius, Politics and Government editor for the Las Vegas Review-Journal, about whether the Nevada Caucuses risk the same kind of results meltdown and delays that plagued the Iowa Caucuses earlier this month.

Video Transcript

Tanya Rivero: All eyes may be on New Hampshire but the next Democratic caucus is happening February 22 in Nevada. Following what happened in Iowa, Nevada is hoping for a smoother run later this month. Let’s bring in Steve Sebelius, he’s the Politics and Government editor for the Las Vegas Review-Journal. Steve, welcome.

So, the Nevada Democratic Party said it would not use the same app or vendor that caused all that confusion and delay in Iowa. Are people in Nevada feeling confident about caucusing after what the saw unfold in Iowa?

Steve Sebelius: Well, I think there’s a good bit of trepidation, Tanya, to be honest with you, because that happened just three weeks before our caucus. We’re doing early voting for the first time ever, any caucus state doing early voting. So how those votes, how they’re going to be counted, how they’re going to be transmitted to the caucus sites, precinct sites on caucus day, is still an open question. So, I think there’s a good deal of concern. The party says it’s working very hard to resolve these things so that they’ll have a smooth caucus. But it would be a lie to say people are calm and getting a lot of sleep right now.

Rivero: What have you specifically learned from officials about what they may be doing to make sure what happened in Iowa does not happen in your state?

Sebelius: Well, first they’ve scrapped the caucus day app and they have scrapped the app for early voting, so that is not going to be used at all. What they’re doing instead is rolling out what they’re calling a “tool” which will be loaded onto iPads, it’s supposedly going to count those early votes to be able to have those tabulated and ready to go at caucus sites and on caucus day.

Now, who made the tool, what it actually is, that’s still up in the air. The party has been very circumspect about revealing the details of that, but I still think there’s a lot of concern about how those votes are going to be counted and whether or not caucus day is going to go smoothly here in Nevada.

Rivero: And Steve, in an opinion column for the Las Vegas Review-Journal, you write, quote, “it’s time to retire the presidential caucus.” Why do you think that?

Sebelius: Well, for a number of reasons. First, what we saw in Iowa, the counting process, that needs to be done. A lot of people are not familiar with it. Nevada is a place that a lot of people come to from other states. Most states don’t use this. Just about four states left that actually use a caucus and some U.S. territories out in the pacific.

It’s cumbersome, it’s somewhat chaotic, everybody understands voting day. You go into your polling place, you cast your vote, and you leave. That’s something that can be much easier. The party, however, disagrees with me completely and shows no signs of abandoning the caucus because they know it builds party. It builds databases, it builds their volunteers. It gets people engaged in the process and they certainly don’t want to give that up.

Rivero: Do you think the average voter, though, might be a little intimidated if they feel like they don’t fully understand the process and just stay home?

Sebelius: Well, I don’t know if they’ll just stay home but I definitely think they’re going to be intimidated by the process especially if you’ve never done it before. Now, we have that early voting option where you can go in and you can rank your choices one through five. You have to do three, you can do up to five. Then go home and say you’ve done your duty.

If you go on caucus day, it is very intimidating. There’s loud groups of people. They’re shouting, they’re yelling, they’re campaigning for their candidates. It can be very overwhelming for somebody from a primary state who’s never seen a caucus before. I don’t know if that’s going to keep anybody home and out of the process, I think, because the early voting process exists. But, it is going to be very intimidating, especially for first-timers.

Rivero: And, finally, Steve, which candidates are voters in Nevada watching most closely do you think?

Sebelius: Well, I think after the “results” from Iowa, and what’s going to happen tomorrow in New Hampshire, all eyes are on Bernie Sanders to see how well he’s going to do. Whether or not he’s going to have momentum coming out of New Hampshire coming toward Nevada. Joe Biden has polled very well here, he’s been on top of the polls, he may need Nevada as a comeback if he doesn’t do well in New Hampshire as is predicted. So, I think those two candidates. Mayor Pete Buttigieg is also on the radar here, and Tom Steyer, who has blanketed, I mean blanketed the state with ads. On every horizontal and vertical surface in the entire state of Nevada, there’s a Tom Steyer ad, so he’s in the public mind here as well.

Rivero: Alright, a lot of folks still in the running there. Steve Sebelius, thank you so much.

Watch on YouTube

Confusion Tuesday Morning as Democrats Scramble for Iowa Caucus Results

Report from the CBS Early Show on the delayed Iowa caucus results.

Iowa Democrats were stunned and confused Monday night as technical issues surrounding the caucus forced a stumbling start to the battle for the Democratic nomination. Officials said they were confident Sunday night that nothing would go wrong, with the state party chairman assuring that Democrats were “probably the most prepared” they had ever been for a caucus.

Major Garrett takes a close look at what went wrong and what candidates are doing to move forward.

More reporting from ABC News

First-in-the-nation Iowa was supposed to be the first indication, based on votes and not polls, of where the candidates stand in the Democratic primary horse race.

But now, after the state party “found inconsistencies in the reporting” of the results, the candidates — and the country — are still in the dark regarding how caucusgoers felt Monday night.

“[T]he integrity of our process, and the results have and always will be our top priority,” Iowa Democratic Party (IDP) Chairman Troy Price told reporters during a 2 a.m. call. “At this point, the IDP is manually verifying all precinct results … We want to emphasize that this is a recording, not a hack on intrusion. And it’s exactly why we have a paper trail and systems in place to uphold the integrity of our process.”

The results are now expected sometime Tuesday, Price said, noting it’s “taking longer than expected” to validate the data they have against the paper trail.

“We have said all along, we have these backups in place for exactly this reason. We are updating campaigns and we will continue to provide updates as they are available,” he said.

Just ten minutes before the caucuses began, Price told reporters outside the media filing center that usually, results start coming in around 9 p.m., an hour after the contest kicks off. But 9 p.m. came and went, and then 10 p.m. came and went, and, at 10:45 p.m., an update from the Iowa Democratic Party finally arrived.

Read the full story from ABCNews.com

2020 Iowa Caucus Results (Feb. 3, 2020)

Results and analysis of the 2020 Iowa Caucuses from the Des Moines Register and other live video streams below.

Alternate Live Streams: Washington Post (YouTube), NBC News (YouTube)

Monday, February 3

Iowa Democratic Caucus
Time:
Caucuses begin at 8 pm ET (7 pm CT) and last several hours
Registration: Same-day registration allowed
Where To Vote: Find Your Caucus Location
Delegates: 
49 (41 pledged, 8 unpledged)
Allocation: Proportional
Threshold: 
15% (A candidate must receive at least 15% to win a delegate)

Other Links: Iowa Vote Registration CheckIowa Voter Registration

The Iowa Democratic Party has created a website called TheCaucuses.org. This site tells you everything you need to know for participating in the Iowa Democratic caucus. You must be a registered Democrat in Iowa to participate but you can register or change registration on caucus day.

Live Iowa Caucus Results

Democratic Candidates React to Kobe Bryant’s Death While Campaigning in Iowa

Reactions and statements on the death of NBA superstar Kobe Bryant from former vice president Joe Biden, Sen. Amy Klobuchar, and former South Bend, Ind., Mayor Pete Buttigieg.

Video Transcript

Joe Biden: As I was getting off the bus, the command, uh, I heard about Kobe Bryant. I didn’t know him well, I only met him a couple times, but uh, you know it makes you realize that you gotta make every day count. Every single day count.

Amy Klobuchar: I just read President Obama’s statement about Kobe Bryant and how, just tragic that is, losing his daughter in that same helicopter crash. And so our thoughts and prayers are with their family.

Pete Buttigieg: As somebody who affected so many fans and supporters and, just very difficult to believe. And, of course, we’ll be thinking of, not just his family, but everybody who’s gonna be impacted and mourning base on that news.

Full Video: Pete Buttigieg Fox News Town Hall From Iowa (Jan. 26)

Former South Bend, Ind., Mayor Pete Buttigieg joined Chris Wallace on the Fox News Channel for a town hall event from Des Moines, Iowa, just days before the 2020 Iowa caucuses.

Fox News Town Hall w/ Pete Buttigieg
Air Date: Sunday, January 26, 2020
Location: River Center in Des Moines, Iowa

Watch the full video of the event below in four parts courtesy of YouTube/Fox News:

Part 1:

Part 2:

Part 3:

Part 4:

The Iowa Caucuses take place Monday, Feb. 3, 2020.

Highlights From Week 1 of President Trump Senate Impeachment Trial

Highlights from the first week of President Trump’s impeachment trial in the U.S. Senate. Scroll down for highlights from each day from week 1 of the trial.

Tuesday, Jan. 21, 2020 (Day 1)

Day one of US President Donald Trump’s impeachment trial began with House managers, including Representatives Adam Schiff and Jerry Nadler, holding a news conference.

 

Wednesday, Jan. 22, 2020 (Day 2)

Day two of US President Donald Trump’s impeachment trial began with Senator Lindsey Graham holding a press conference outside the Senate in which he claimed that “When it comes to Donald Trump” Democrats were “Willing to destroy the institution of the office in the name of getting him”

Thursday, Jan. 23, 2020 (Day 3)

On day three of Donald Trump’s impeachment trial in the Senate, House Democrats have begone to wrap up their arguments against the President. House Impeachment Manager Adam Schiff has accused Donald Trump of putting his own interests above those of the United States and insisted Rudi Juliani was a “hand-grenade”.

Friday, Jan. 24, 2020 (Day 4)

Day four highlights of the Senate Impeachment trial against President Trump.

Saturday, Jan. 25, 2020 (Day 5)

On day five of the impeachment trial against President Donald Trump and the Republican defense council have commenced their arguments in the Senate. White House Counsel Pat Cipollone started the proceeding by claiming the Democrats had put forward no evidence and had “fallen far short” of the burden of evidence. He pressed the seriousness of removing a president from office and urged senators to reflect on the precedents being set.

Trump’s personal lawyer Jay Sekulow referenced the Mueller Report and stressed how it’s finding failed to establish a link between Trump’s presidential campaign and Russian interference.

The trial resumes on Monday, Jan. 27.

Full Video: President Trump Speaks at “March For Life” Rally in Washington

Full remarks from President Trump addressing the annual “March for Life” anti-abortion rally in Washington, DC.

What: President Trump’s full speech at the March for Life rally
Date: Friday, January 24, 2020
Location: The National Mall in Washington

More reporting from CNN:

President Donald Trump on Friday reiterated his support for tighter abortion restrictions, pledging at the annual March for Life rally in Washington that “unborn children have never had a stronger defender in the White House.”

Trump, making history as the first President to attend the event since it began nearly a half-century ago, looked to strengthen his ties to a key coalition of his political base, which he’ll need as he seeks reelection this year. He used his remarks to not only express support for the movement but to paint those supportive of looser abortion laws as radicals, often employing language that mischaracterized the views of most Democrats.

“Together we are the voice for the voiceless. When it comes to Democrats — and you know this — you’ve seen what’s happened. Democrats have embraced the most radical and extreme positions taken and seen in this country for years and decades and you can even say for centuries,” Trump said.

The Trump administration has consistently worked to regulate or restrict abortion access, appointed two Supreme Court justices seen as holding anti-abortion views and on Friday announced it will take legal action against California over the state’s mandate that insurers, including private health insurance policies, cover abortions.

“Why, Why, Why?” – Joe Biden Snaps at CBS News Reporter

CBS News reporter Ed O’Keefe asked Joe Biden about his feud with Sen. Bernie Sanders and a tense exchange followed with the vice president asking “why, why, why” and telling O’Keefe to “calm down.”

Gayle King: Vice President Biden may want to avoid the impeachment trial but he’s not backing away from his feud with Bernie Sanders. Ed O’Keefe caught up with him in Des Moines, and they had, how do we describe this, Ed? This “remarkable” exchange is the word?

Ed O’Keefe: That’s one way of putting it, Gayle. We wanted to ask the Vice President why he’s feuding again with Bernie Sanders. Remember, earlier this week he told us he accepted Sanders’ apology after one of his supporters called the former vice president “corrupt.” But, within hours, both camps were out with dueling attack videos.

Biden calling out “Bernie’s negative attacks” and Sanders raising questions about Biden’s previous willingness to fiddle with federal benefits. While Sanders is in Washington dealing with impeachment, Biden was out here talking to voters. So, we wanted to ask him, why this change in strategy? Take a look.

O’Keefe (yelling question at Biden): Yesterday you said you accepted Bernie’s apology, now you’re attacking him. Why are you doing that? Why wasn’t his apology enough, Mr. Vice President? Why attack Sanders?

Joe Biden: Why, why, why, why, why, why… you’re getting nervous, man. Calm down, it’s OK. He apologized for saying that I was corrupt. He didn’t say anything about whether or not I was telling the truth about Social Security.

King: Ed, I wasn’t sure where that was going, what were you thinking?

O’Keefe: Look, we ask the candidates questions, how they respond is up to them. Clearly, in this case, Biden, a little touchy. He’s sensitive to this charge that he wants to change up Social Security. Yes, as a Senator in the 1990s he was open to making changes to federal benefits to balance the budget, but now as a presidential candidate, he says he wants to preserve and expand Social Security in part because seniors are living longer.

How exactly we would pay for it is a detail to be sorted out later. But, look, with Biden and Sanders either tied or first and second here in Iowa and across the country, this is a feud that is likely to continue with eleven days until the Iowa caucus.

King: First it seemed like he didn’t want to answer, but he turned around so I give him credit for that.

Elizabeth Warren: Trump Judges Are Homophobic, Racist, and Sexist

Sen. Elizabeth Warren speaking about the federal judiciary and President Trump’s judicial appointments at the “We the People 2020” democracy forum in Des Moines, Iowa on January 19, 2020.

Video Transcript

Sen. Elizabeth Warren: I think what’s at the heart of it is who do you ask to be a judge, who do you want on your list to be a judge? I’ll tell you what the answer has been for Donald Trump because I’ve seen this, guys.

Homophobic? That’s in. Racist? That’s in. Uh, Sexist? Oh, yeah, most definitely. And, anti-voter, that’s been a big qualification.

He has named one person after another who, and I don’t mean we have kind of a sense that that’s who those people are. I mean, look at their written records. Look at the activities they’ve already engaged in.

Look at the fights they’ve been in and which side they were on. Our answer has to be that we have the judiciary that truly respects the rule of law and respects every single human being in this country.

That is the job of the judiciary. It is there to protect individual rights. It’s not there to protect corporate rights. It’s not there to protect folks with money. It’s there to protect individual rights.

Elizabeth Warren Blasts Mike Bloomberg For Delaying Financial Disclosures

Sen. Elizabeth Warren speaks about the influence of money in politics and directly blasts former New York City Mayor Michael Bloomberg for spending $200 million on the presidential campaign so far. From Jan. 19, 2020, in Des Moines, Iowa.

Video Transcript

Sen. Elizabeth Warren: And understand this, it’s going on right now, in the primaries. We’ve got billionaires who think they can just buy an election. Case and point, Michael Bloomberg has already dropped $200 million to make his voice heard, and drown out every other voice in this Democratic primary.

Think about what that means, and he plans to skip the democracy part of the election, that is, coming to places like Iowa, New Hampshire, South Carolina, and Nevada, and meeting people.

Instead, it’s all going to be set up for TV, running his TV ads to make it work. And, here comes the latest parts. It just comes out that he has applied to the Federal Election Commission to delay making his federally required financial disclosures.

When does he want to delay it to? Until after Super Tuesday, and we have picked, very possibly, have picked our candidate by then. So think about that. If he has entanglements with China, serious conflicts of interest, business interests in other parts of the world, or corporations.

When are we going to know about this? Not until after Super Tuesday. That is not how democracy is supposed to work and we need to shut that down.

I’m so glad to be here with all of you because today, this is our big chance in 2020. To build a grassroots movement, to make our voices heard across this nation, to say we don’t want a government that just works for billionaires. We don’t want a government that just works for giant corporations. We don’t want a government that just works for corporate executives. We want a government that works for the people. That’s what democracy is about and that’s what we can do in 2020. Thank you all! Thank you!

Tulsi Gabbard Sues Hillary Clinton Over “Russian Asset” Claims

In a report from Fox Business with Neil Cavuto, Hawaii Rep. Tulsi Gabbard is suing Hillary Clinton for $50 million alleging defamation over claims that Gabbard is a Russian asset.

Video Transcript

Hawaii Rep. Tulsi Gabbard: She and her minions are trying to smear me, smear my character, and undermine my campaign, labeling me as a foreign agent, as a trader to my country.

Neil Cavuto: So, now she’s suing. Democratic presidential candidate Tulsi Gabbard filing a $50 million lawsuit against Hillary Clinton for defamation. Hillary Vaugn has the very latest, Hillary.

Hillary Vaughn: Hey Neil, well Hillary Clinton still is not running for president but she is still stirring the pot in the Democratic primary by firing shots at candidates still in the race and now her meddling could end up costing her millions after Tulsi Gabbard filed a $50 million lawsuit against Clinton for saying this:

Hillary Clinton: She’s a favorite of the Russians. They have a bunch of sites and bots and other ways of supporting her so far. And, that’s assuming Jill Stein will give it up, which she might not because she’s also a Russian asset. Yeah, she’s a Russian asset.

Vaughn: In the lawsuit filed today, Gabbard says Clinton has a personal vendetta against her because she endorsed Bernie Sanders in 2016, so she’s accusing Clinton of defamation that cost her millions in potential donors and also potential voters, writing in the lawsuit, “Clinton got exactly what she wanted by lying about Tulsi, she harmed her political and personal rival’s reputation and ongoing presidential campaign and started a damaging whisper campaign based on baseless, but vicious, untruths.”

We reached out to Clinton’s spokesperson for comment and are awaiting a response, but Clinton also fired fresh attacks against Bernie Sanders, saying in a new documentary, “nobody likes him.” Clinton is brushing off her Bernie blast tweeting last night, she thought everyone wanted her “authentic and unvarnished views,” but Neil, some of those views may be getting her into trouble in court.

Cavuto: Alright Hillary, thank you very much…

Election Central is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to amazon.com